10.31.09

What Do You Call a 9-Card Suit?

Posted in Defense, Opening Leads, Preempts at 6:02 am by Administrator

I had an interesting hand today. The auction really should have been quite standard and probably was at virtually every table. The key difference at the various tables was probably the defense.

I picked up the following hand, with nobody vulnerable:

Kx x x KJ98xxxxx

Everyone probably opened this hand 5 clubs in first seat, and the hand was probably passed out. After all, there is an old bridge adage — what do you call a 9 card suit? – Trump!! A 5-level opener should generally be a hand with an 8-9 card minor and about 8 tricks in the hand, perhaps 9 if vulnerable, and less than opening values. The hand probably has little defensive value, if any. For those who play traditional gambling 3NT opening bids, the suit should not be a solid 8-card minor.

The hand above fits this definition. I held a 9-card broken minor suit (not a bad suit, but not solid) and a doubleton king on the side. The side king was of questionable defensive value. I looked at the hand and figured I had 1, possibly 2 club losers and possibly a spade loser. This amounted to approximately 8 tricks, so I opened 5 clubs. If my club suit was stronger, say KQJxxxxxx with a side king, I might have opened 1 club, but with the broken suit, 5 clubs was the right call.

The opening lead was the A of clubs. I will come back to the opening lead shortly. Dummy hits with the following hand:

ATx AKxx KQTxxx —

A very good dummy. My partner gave careful thought to raising me to 6C, but she trusted me to have about 8 tricks and a club suit with at least 1 loser in it. Therefore, in order to make 6C, I would have to either have the A of diamonds (which I should not have for the non-vulnerable 5C opening) or a diamond void (possible to have but impossible for her to rely on or to discover without committing us to 6 clubs). Her pass was clearly the correct bid. If she had the A of diamonds instead of the KQ, then she should raise to 6 clubs, hoping I only had 1 club loser.

Back to the opening lead. My LHO (left hand opponent) lead the A of clubs from the following hand:

Jxxxx Qxxx Jxx A

I might have the exact holdings in the majors off a little bit, but she did not hold the QJ in either major. In any case, the A of clubs is almost certainly the right lead. It is hard for her to know which major suit (or diamonds for that matter) is the best lead, but leading the A of clubs on this auction will rarely give away a trick and will give her the opportunity to look at dummy and find the best shift. Well, she looked at dummy and shifted to a low spade!!!! I nearly fell out of my chair!!! After that great opening lead and looking at dummy, she found one of the two suits that she could shift to and let me make the contract. Upon the spade shift, I won the A of spades in dummy, played the A and K of hearts, pitching my losing diamond on the second heart. I now trumped a diamond to get to my hand, played the K of clubs and found the bad news — the clubs were 3-1 and I had to lose the Q of clubs. So I made my contract.

Looking at dummy, if my LHO trusted me to have 8 or 9 clubs and probably no outside ace, she clearly should have switched to a diamond at trick 2. My RHO (right hand opponent) would now win her ace and eventually would get the Q of clubs (as I do not have enough transportation to set up a trump coup to capture the Q of clubs – with 9 clubs, I simply have too many clubs to use up in order to set up a trump coup).

About half the players were in 5C, making 5, and half went down 1 trick. Basically, if the opening lead was a major, the declarer can pitch away the diamond loser on the second heart before drawing trump, and therefore make the contract. No person on opening lead in their right mind would find the lead of a diamond from Jxx on this auction. However, if someone did lead a diamond at trick one, that person would defeat the contract. However, I believe the best lead was the A of clubs, followed by a diamond switch.

10.24.09

Surprises Abound

Posted in Uncategorized at 1:17 am by Administrator

My partner and I were playing in a team game today and I picked up the following hand:

AKxx K AQxx Axxx

A nice 20 HCP with a 4-4-4-1 shape and singleton K. I was in fourth seat and was trying to decide whether to open the hand 2NT when my partner opens the auction 1H!!! Surprise #1. Okay, so I bid 1S, waiting for the expected 2H rebid. Well, partner’s next bid is 4D – a splinter in support of spades!! Surprises #2 & #3 – partner has a fit and a good enough hand to splinter when I have promised only 5-6 HCP. So I ask for key cards by bidding 4NT and partner shows me 1 or 4 key cards by bidding 5C. Okay, no surprise here. So I asked for the Q of spades by bidding 5D. Partner now bids 6C, showing the Q of spades and the K of clubs. So I bid 7S (if this were matchpoints, I might have bid 7NT, but 7S is clearly a safer contract). Now the surprise was on my partner’s face.

My partner’s hand was:

QJTx AJ9xxx — Kxx

Obviously, her splinter was based on shape, not high cards, but it was a good call – even with a minimum hand, there would be a reasonable play for game, depending on my shape.

If felt it was a very elegant auction to find a cold grand slam. The opponents led a trump at trick 1. I took it in dummy, cashed the K of hearts in my hand, led a club to the king and trumped a heart high. The Q and T of hearts fell on my left on the first two heart tricks so now the hearts were set up. I pulled the trump, ending on dummy (they broke 3-2, but I could handle a 4-1 split at this point – if the split were 5-0 I am never making this contract). If the spades split, I can make the contract even the hearts break with the QTxx in one hand.

At the other table, the opponents, through an odd auction landed in 7NT!! This works because the hearts break the way they did. At IMPs, this would be a pushed board; however, our teammates doubled, so we lost 7 imps even though we were in a vulnerable grand slam, making. That was the worst suprise.

10.02.09

Website Update In the Works

Posted in Uncategorized at 4:42 pm by Administrator

Sorry I haven’t written in a few days. I am in the process of updating my website. It will soon be carrying articles on bidding, specific bidding conventions, declarer play, and defensive play issues. There will also be weekly quizzes on bidding and declarer play. This should take me another 1-2 weeks to get the first group of articles written and posted and the site redesigned. By then, I should be geared up to update this blog and the website regularly.