08.09.10

Being a Good Partner

Posted in Partnership at 12:00 am by Administrator

For a long time, I have wanted to write about a number of issues that do not deal with specific hands, bidding, playing or defending issues. Among the topics are partnership behavior, ethics, alert procedures, and director rulings.

Today, I want to take a few minutes to talk about being a good partner. What does it take to be a good partner? First and foremost, you must be polite to your partner, at all times! I strive to be polite, courteous and friendly to all of my partners, be they peers, students,better players, lesser players, pick-up partners, regular partners, or people with whom I am filling in when directing.

Every time my partner lays down a dummy when I am declarer, I say thank you, regardless of how good or bad the dummy is and how close it is to what partner described in the bidding (if they did any bidding at all).

I always try to make my partners feel appreciated and I go out of my way to make them feel appreciated and not taken for granted. I have one partner, with whom I play every week, that I e-mail to say how much I enjoyed the game. This is someone who I never want to feel as if I have taken that person for granted.

I also play with a lot of students. While I don’t generally send them e-mails like the partner I described above, I make sure to point out what they did well in addition to what they need to work on. One such partner often replies bulls**t, but I always mean what I say. This particular student makes a significant number of mistakes, many from inattention, many from holes in that person’s knowledge; however, I always mean the compliments I give.

Remember that every partner, including yourself, makes mistakes. It is acceptable to politely point these out to partner if partner has not recognized the error. Depending on the relationship between the partners, it is sometimes okay to good-naturedly tease the partner about a silly or careless mistake (assuming you are willing to accept the same teasing when the roles are reversed). Once in a while, you may get irritated by a partner’s mistake(s). Avoid showing your irritation at all costs. It does no good to yell or scold a partner. All that will accomplish is to cause partner to make more mistakes. Once in a a while, everyone will show some irritation; however, do so as mildly as possible and avoid showing it when you can. I used to have one regular partner who might make one salty comment when I made a mistake, but that was it – he dropped it. He never lost his temper. That is the sign of a good partner. I have also had partners who yelled at me at least 3 times a session. That always caused me to make more mistakes. I no longer play with such people. I tolerated it when I was an up and coming player and the hot-tempered partner was mentoring me. Today, even if I play with someone significantly better than I am, I will not tolerate anything other than mild irritation. There is never a need to lose one’s temper. Every issue can be addressed by rational discussion, even if the end result is to agree to disagree.

As a result of the way I treat partners, I am always in great demand as a partner. Everyone wants to be treated well, and the people I play with appreciate the way I treat them. Even if I am having an off day and can’t get out of my own way and make every wrong decision I can make (as I did a few days ago), my partners excuse it because I excuse it in them.

So remember to treat you partners well. Make sure that they feel appreciated. I truly like every one of my partners and every student who takes playing lessons with me. I make certain that they know I like them and that I appreciate them. My students know that I will correct their mistakes (or at least as many as I have time to address) and that I will compliment them on what they do well and what they have improved upon.

Do the same with your partners and you will never have a problem finding someone to play with.

08.08.10

An Interesting Balancing Issue

Posted in Balancing at 6:23 am by Administrator

Sorry for my long absence but I have been swamped and my health marginal, so I have not had time to write.

The other day, my partner and I had a hand that presented an interesting balancing problem. As a general rule, I don’t let my opponents play suit contracts, at matchpoints, at the 2-level (except I will occasionally allow them to play 2S when we are vulnerable) absent a good reason to leave them alone (such as I am afraid to push them into a makeable game or I have a trump stack and I am happy to let them play the contract there). Friday was no exception.

I passed in first seat holding the following collection of garbage:

S: 8
H: Q10652
D: K98
C: Q1074

The opponents are vulnerable and we are not. My left hand opponent opened 1S and it passes around to me. Now I would not consider overcalling this mediocre club suit in the direct seat at either the 1- or 2-level, as necessary, but I have no problem balancing with 2H over 1S. Left hand opponent bids 2S and again partner and right hand opponent pass. At this vulnerability, I am not letting them play 2S, so I balanced with a double. Partner can pick the suit at this point. She knows I have 5 hearts and probably some values, but less than opening count.

The question becomes what should she do. Her hand was:

S: A964
H: K8
D: Q6
C: J8652

The first question is should she pass and convert my balancing double to a penalty double. The answer is unequivocally no. I cannot be trying to protect a penalty double in her hand because if she doubled 2S, it would be for penalty. It would not be responsive or Rosenkranz or any other conventional double that I know of, absent a specific agreement, because I was balancing as a passed hand, not overcalling in the direct seat. Therefore pass is not an option. Additionally, her hand is not good enough for a low-level double of spades because her spade suit is so bad. She probably has one spade trick, maybe a second if she can trump.

Should she bid 2NT? Absolutely not! I am a passed hand and she has only 10 high card points. That cannot rationally make 2NT absent some miraculous lie of the cards.

So now should she bid her 2-card heart suit, going into a known 5-2 fit, or bid 3C, looking for a better fit? Bidding diamonds simply is not rational with her 3-card suit unless I had bid diamonds. The answer lies in the shape of her hand and the fact that I reopened with a double. For my reopening double, my hand has the following shapes: 2-5-3-3, 1-5-4-3, 1-5-3-4,, or 0-5-4-4. If my hand was 2-5-4-2 or 2-5-2-4, I would have rebid my 4-card minor, as it is lower in rank than my major and my partner, if appropriate, could correct to 3H. I would not reopen with a doubleton as I could end up having my partner play a 3-2 fit, which I can tell you from experience is not a lot of fun. My partner now knows I have one of 4 hand patterns. If partner was 4-2-4-3 or 4-2-3-4, she should bid 3H and take the known 7-card fit rather than risk running into a 6-card 3-3. However, with a 5-card suit, she knows that I have at least 3 cards in her club suit.

At the table, my partner chose to bid 3H over my reopening double of 2S. I went down 3 for -150, which was an average board. Right hand opponent should have raised the opener’s spades, but did not with her 7 HCP and 3-card spade support (yes, opener freely rebid a 5-card spade suit), and half the field played 2S or 3S making 4 for 170 (although a proper defense holds the contract to 3S for 140). One pair played 3C our way, making 3 for 110. That was the top board.

The bottom line is that if partner balances as a passed hand, if you have 2-card support for partner and a 5-card suit of your own, if partner balances a second time, bid your suit as it almost certainly an 8-card fit, and possible a 9-card fit.